Відео

You are very welcome, I am really pleased I was able to help ☺️

Thank you for this Sabrina, very helpful. I hope it went really well 😀

You are very welcome ☺️

You are very welcome, I am pleased I could help ☺️

I am just happy I was able to help. Well done 👏

You are welcome, I am really pleased I have been able to help ☺️

Like focus more on these

Not possible to know for sure but my predictions might help. Hope it goes well tomorrow 🙂

You are very welcome ☺️ hope your exam goes really well tomorrow!

That is lovely to hear, I am so pleased I was able to help you on your journey 🥰

That would work well and the different times judgement could happen...is it straight away or at end of time? Plus what judgement would look like e.g sheep and goats :)

You can discuss many things in your DCT answers so just think about what best fits the question and what you would like to argue. I hope it goes really well tomorrow ☺️

@@IThinkThereforeITeach I usually have no issue figuring out what topic its asking, but it is just a fear from that ethics paper. I think my first 2 went well. I wrote 16 pages on Philo and another 16 on ethics, so i think I have done okay on them. Thank you

Also sorry for asking you straight after! I was travelling back from the library after a hefty day of revision and missed most of the livestream!

I'm pretty sure they asked a question on Ephesians 5:23 before so they could, but I'd say its very unlikely

also i hate dct too, especially as i am an atheist so It doesn't interest me. If i was Christian i probs would like

@@billygorringe I think DCT is my fav one hahah, I'm just severely burnt out haha- my exams started on 20th May lol - but thank you!

@@coragane5127 Same, I AM SO BURNT OUT. Tmr is my last one, i just want them to be over. Also good luck, we both got this!

Wow! How lovely to hear from you Grace, yes I taught Claire many years ago. You are lucky to have such a wonderful teacher ☺️

You are very welcome ☺️ yes that all sounds great, well done! Hope all goes really well tomorrow 🙏

Pluralism and Theology came up last year :)

Yes so 1 paragraph on him being son of God and 1 against (political liberator) and another against (teacher)

Discuss how you know he is unique and thus not fully human, such as his miracles. His teachings could just be human teachings so no different from Abraham or Moses so how is Jesus unique -only being the incarnate makes him unique so discussing whether he is or not. Hope that makes sense :)

The exam board have been known to do that in the DCT section :)

That is a very good interpretation and works well when discussing spiritual body :)

@@IThinkThereforeITeach thanks Mrs this is going to be my 4th exam this week and I also have chemistry on Friday 😭 but it’s worth the pain and suffering . I’ll be living in solidarity until results day xD 🫡🫣

You could talk about conversion but the question is asking what the challenges might be and how Christianity has overcome them e.g SRM or interfaith dialogue etc. For questions such as these you have to adapt the material you have covered in that topic (as you said Redemptoris Missio) to fit the question. Hope this helps:)

Thank you for your lovely comment, I am so pleased I have been able to help :) I hope your Islam paper goes really well!

That would be brilliant, it shows extension and depth of understanding with a critical edge! :)

surely yes? you could link to william james' criteria no?

Absolutely - RE definitely counts as a counter to miracles - maybe pick an example that is less controversial though as I am not sure TB would rally back up your point unless you mention the speaking in tongues that happens ther as that makes TB seem more valid :)

You are so kind Chloe - thank you :) I am really pleased my videos helped and I hope your final exam goes really well!

That would work great, especially as 'changed' is the first part of the question so structuring with Reuther makes sense whilst bringing Daly in as a counter argument - this structure supports the structure of the question :)

It was a tricky question - this sounds like a really good response with lots of knowledge and key words used and a line of argument. Well done!

I don't Max - this however would be very useful! You might be able to find it in a student forum or from a student who might have sat them :)

The argument that God’s judgement takes place after death immediately, may be persuasive considering certain language used in the New Testament and in parables told by Christ Jesus. In this essay, I shall discuss the logistics of “The rich man and lazarus” and biblical views from scholars such as Luke, one of the Gospel writers and Peter, one of Jesus' disciples. The parable of the Rich man and Lazarus, in Luke 16, is a story in favour of immediate judgement. This is made somewhat clear where after the rich man goes to hell for treating the less fortunate (Lazarus) with negligence, he had wished to return back to earth to warn people. “For I have five brothers, let him warn them” Luke 16 verse 28. This however makes the key assumption that there were people still alive on earth to return to. From this, it can be inferred that people are judged and sent to heaven or hell immediately after death. Historically speaking the parable would have been taught by Jesus, therefore giving it extra validity as biblical evidence in support of the immediate judgement view point. On the other hand however, the story in being a parable, can be argued as being perhaps more symbolic as opposed to a realistically accurate account for what happens to sinners when they die. This would make the view significantly less persuasive. Another key account of potential evidence for immediate judgement lies in Luke 23:43. This chapter describes the death of Jesaus of Nazareth. Jesus says “truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise”. The use of the word “today” by Jesus, heavily suggests that the man he was conversing with would be in heaven with Jesus that day. This would mean that the man had been judged by God after death immediately. However this also opens up new possible explanations for the timing /dating of judgement. This is because the man beside Jesus had already been judged by God/Jesus and accepted into heaven (for humbling himself before God and admitting his sin) before he had died. Regardless, the evidence suggests that the judgement had occurred that day or beforehand. Despite previous evidence, the quote used; Luke 23:43 may be interpreted differently. In Hebrew, or at least in ancient Hebrew, there was no use of commas. This means that the meaning of the verse can be changed from “truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise” to “truly I tell you today, you will be in paradise”. The distinction is important because Jesus Christ could be saying how the man beside him will be in “paradise” with him that very day; or Jesus could be simply stating how it was that specific day to which he was telling him that he’s going to be with Jesus in “paradise”. This may not be suggesting in favour of immediate judgement, however it does not argue against it either. Therefore this argument against immediate judgement is ineffective. Despite all of this, there is key biblical evidence to suggest that there is a singular day of judgement for everyone at once. In 2 Peter 3:7 it states, “...the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgement and destruction of the ungodly”. The bible is very explicit in stating that there is a specific day for judgement, it is less so explicit in telling whether or not this day is for the individual or for a collective. The distinction between the two is, once again, important, seeming as if judgement were to happen immediately after death it would not make sense for everyone to be judged together as people die at different dates. On a different hand however, part of the verse where it states “and destruction of the ungodly” suggests that both the day of judgement and this so-called destruction both take place at a singular point in time for everyone to experience. In taking a deeper look at the verse 2 Peter 3:7 there are two very important things mentioned. The verse doesn’t exclusively mention judgement for those on earth but for the “heavens and earth”. This may in fact suggest that those of whom had already been judged and gone to “heaven” will be judged again. This point of view accepts both views that judgement can happen straight after death and at the end of time. This view aligns itself with scripture and cancels out any perceived contradictions. It is therefore a logical conclusion. Therefore the view that judgement takes place after death is most definitely convincing; especially seeming as it doesn’t entirely contradict the day of judgement that many christians believe God has planned for them at the end of time.

I also love Michael Cera ; )

You would discuss judgment (sheep/ goats and Lazarus), personal identity of who is being judged based on what (maybe some links to NOG) and then what afterlife looks like heaven, hell or purgatory, I think that would be easiest way to answer it :)

@@IThinkThereforeITeach Thank you that's really helpful

@@Daffiestchip716 amazing essay !

That would work yes - you could discuss whether pluralism does undermine or not then whether another approach e.g inclusivism is better :)

it's a possibility but most areas for this topic have been asked so makes it hard to predict a question but it didn't come up last year so be prepared just in case :)

I would say all four are needed as they are the main parts of his argument. So even if specific e.g to discipleship you still need to link to Grace etc because they all interleave together :)

Good question. You can overlap the topics but the question will mention either daly/reuther or part of their approach e.g abandon vs reform Christianity. Best advice I can give you is to look at the ppt of past questions to see how the examiners usually word the questions :)

I am sorry I don't, I only teach Christianity :)

I am so pleased my videos and predictions are helping. It sounds like you are doing your best which is all that you can do! I hope your final exam goes really well :)

That is so lovely to hear :) Thank you! I hope your final exam goes really well

I know, I think i should be a lottery ticket haha!

Thank you for the questions :) I hope your exam went really well and yes I am pleased with my predictions I was pretty close this year :)

You are very welcome Sabrina, I am just pleased I was able to help :)

Outstanding

That's good to hear :)

Both exams i took a gamble to skip revising like 1/3 content and both exams the gamble paid off, lovely questions

On the whole, from what I can gather, students found the topic areas okay just the wording was a little bit tricky.

That is great to hear, I'm so pleased I could help :)

They are supporting the same argument just stating the same thing slightly differently

Hi Imogen, hope your exam went well yesterday. Foot is just an extension of Bradley, so Bradley talks about facts and ethics whereas Foot adds in about people and their characteristics as well as ethics. Bradley means that you find evidence of ethics in society/ world to back up the ethical statement into a fact - hope that make sense :)

You are very welcome! I hope your exam goes really well this afternoon :)

I am really pleased they have helped :) Good luck today!

Fingers crossed :) I hope it goes really well!

i’m pretty sure if a question came up, something like “discuss how useful Kantian ethics is in regards to sexual ethics,” then you’d just need to talk about Kant’s views on the topic and evaluate them as being either good or bad. e.g., Kant is against premarital and extramarital sex. same for business ethics

Either approach works well so it depends on what you are most comfortable with. I often find that whatever is mentioned first in the question is the structure of your essay so if it says NL and issues then NL is your structure and the issues are linked to this. Hope that makes sense :)

you don’t really have to but if it helps to support your point, then bring them in, but make sure you mention scholars. like for the question “does globalisation encourage ethical action?” you could bring in how Milton Friedman says that businesses have no responsibility to behave ethically so it’s not a concern whether globalisation encourages action or not (that’s if you were arguing against, saying it doesn’t encourage ethical action).

@@sabrina-xm8mz thank u sm!! hope it all goes well :)

@@Ava-ui1wkgood luck! :)

Hi Ava, answer the specific question they ask you. So if they ask a general on business that is what they are wanting. If you wish to bring in a normative approach, do so for evaluation and make it clear why they are relevant to your line of argument and the question.

@@IThinkThereforeITeach​you were right it was on business ethics and utilitarianism!!! Thank you for all your help over the exam period, i do buddhism so wont be around anymore but thank you so much for all the work you put into helping us!! Couldn’t have done it without your channel xoxo

Yes

Yes as it is on the spec and never been asked before :)

You are very welcome ☺️

You are very welcome ☺️ I hope all goes well tomorrow!!